the "election" issue
BEEF: the meatArticlesColumnsReviewsEtcetera


NOVEMBER-06-2000          
THE ELECTION ISSUE           

T H E   B E E F   I N T E R V I E W
Meet Diddley Squat, the First Critter to Run for President
Looking for an alternative to Bush, Gore, Nader, and Buchanan? Vote "Hamster" on November 7th.


BEEF
Diddley, how much does the public have a right to know about a candidate's personal history? And, how much do you think the public has a right to know about your personal history?


Diddley SquatDiddley Squat
Two part question:

(1) I do not believe there is an explicit obligation on the part of a candidate for public office to reveal the intimate details of his or her life. On the other hand, voters might well feel that some specific matter (health, for instance) is sufficiently important that they would choose to withhold their votes from a candidate who does not provide the desired information. Let the voters decide.

(2) Because I have lived all my life in a wire cage, it may surprise people to know that I am a strong advocate of personal privacy. However, I am equally adamant in my opposition to government secrecy. I do believe that as a public official, my conduct is of concern to the nation, and to that end, Yarash Junior and I have discussed at length the idea of installing little web-cams all over the White House so that, if we are elected, the public can see everything that happens, day and night...


BEEF
With the recent news about Bush's 1976 DUI, a candidate's past has become an issue in the campaign. Do people have a right to know if a candidate has done anything illegal in his past?


Diddley SquatDiddley Squat
Yes I do. This involves the law. And it involves hypocrisy, more often than not. In the past 20 years, approximately a million people have been sent to prison, many of them charged with possessing substances that one well-known politician admits he smoked "but did not inhale" and another says he "has not used" since 1974. The real issue here should be whether persons in positions of authority are actually willing to put others behind bars for what they themselves have done
.


BEEF
During this campaign, many candidates have been talking about upholding the dignity of the office. Can you tell BEEF readers about how you can do that better than Al Gore and George W. Bush can?


Diddley SquatDiddley Squat
In the present election cycle, the term "dignity of the office" tends to be a code word for sexual misconduct. But there are many other things that ought likewise to be considered ill-suited to the office. Lying and deceit fall into this category, as does unjust aggression, making material profit from one's position, and infringing on the civil liberties of others, to name just a few.

A hamster administration will have no secrets, tell no lies, disregard the rights of no one, and refrain from violence. Furthermore, both Yarash Junior and I have offered to serve free of monetary compensation, asking only modest amounts of nutritious hamster food and an occasional treat. And I can assure you that we are both rodents of sterling moral character.


BEEF
The debates earlier this fall frequently focused on whether each of the candidates have raised questions about the experience one needs to be President of the United States. A hamster has never held the office of the presidency, and that fact alone raises many questions. Why are you qualified to run this country?


Diddley SquatDiddley Squat
The answer to this question is probably as surprising as it is simple. We feel that our lack of experience is a factor in our favor. Common sense tells us that the longer someone is a part of the political power structure, the more addicted to power that person becomes and the more likely to abuse it. The candidate best qualified to serve the nation is the one closest to the people who elect him/her. By definition, that excludes career politicians.


BEEF
Jim Lehrer of the PBS program News Hour opened the presidential debate at Wake Forest with the following question for George W. Bush: "Have you formed any guiding principles for exercising this enormous power?" If you had been allowed to participate in the debates, what would have been your answer?


Diddley SquatDiddley Squat
Hamsters have strong anarchistic tendencies. Do not expect us to use combat forces, leveraged economic aid, propaganda, or even diplomacy to bully other countries. By giving respect, we gain respect. And we earn ourselves enemies by treating others as enemies.


BEEF
Forieign policy is always an important part of the presidency. Considering the conflict in the Middle East, what do you think the United States should do right now to help bring about peace? Will there ever be a day when hamsters will be required to enlist in our military forces?


Diddley SquatDiddley Squat
Another two-part question:

(1) Since the early days of the cold war era, the largest share of American military and economic assistance has gone to that one region.

Yet there is no peace. Given large enough amounts of money and a sufficient period of time, a powerful government can create problems that the most brilliant mind in the world cannot solve.

YarishThe Middle East illustrates my point. In fact, a campaign worker (my great-aunt Sophie) headed up a research team that studied the question and found that confrontations have increased in direct proportion to outside involvement. This involvement will cease under a hamster administration. The results won't be noticeable immediately, but eventually you will see that both sides will be well served by a mutually-bartered solution that is theirs and theirs alone.

(2) Compulsory military service is contrary to everything rodents stand for.


BEEF
Although the new president of our country will have to face problems overseas, he or she will also have to deal with U.S. issues, such as hamster discrimination. As President, how would you deal with these problems?


Emory SquatDiddley Squat
Yarash and I have the lowest "negative polling" numbers of anyone in the current presidential campaign. In other words, the percentage of the population having an unfavorable opinion of us is close to zero. We cannot force anyone to love us, of course, but we can set an example that will go along way toward raising the status of rodents. In fact, we hope that the process has already begun by means of our campaign
.


BEEF
Thank you, Diddley. And best of luck during the rest of the campaign. Send our best to your V.P. and partner in crime, Yarash.

Yarish

Diddley Squat
Thank you again for contacting us.
Vote "Hamster" on November 7th.


FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT http://www.hamsterforpresident.com/
© Copyright BEEF: the Meat, 1996-2001.   All Rights Reserved.